To: (Name withheld at the person's request.)
SUMMARY:
No prohibited conflict of interest would be created were a Financial Examiner Supervisor with the Department of Banking and Finance, Division of Finance, to participate in the Department of Law Enforcement Auxiliary Special Agent Program. Because the position with FDLE would carry with it the power to make arrests, it would be considered a public office for purposes of the Code of Ethics. As a holder of a public office, the auxiliary special agent would be prohibited from having a conflicting employment relationship pursuant to Section 112.313(7)(a), Florida Statutes. Since the Division of Finance is neither subject to the regulation of, nor doing business with, the Department of Law Enforcement, and there appears to be nothing in the employment relationship with the Division of Finance that would create a continuing or frequently recurring conflict of interest or that would impede the full and faithful discharge of his public duties as an auxiliary special agent, the Code of Ethics would not prevent a Division of Finance employee from becoming an auxiliary special agent. CEO's 85-22, 81-67, 84-18, and 81-5
QUESTION:
In order to analyze your situation under the Code of Ethics, we first must determine whether the positions of Financial Examiner Supervisor and FDLE Auxiliary Special Agent are public office or public employment. Section 112.313(1), Florida Statutes, defines an officer as "any person elected or appointed to hold office in any agency." As your Supervisor position is neither an elected nor appointed one, we consider you to be a public employee of the Division of Finance. However, using prior Attorney General opinions as precedent, we believe an auxiliary law enforcement officer is a public officer for purposes of the Code of Ethics. In AGO 86-84 and AGO 77-63, the Attorney General found auxiliary law enforcement officers to be public officers, using as the basis for his rationale the Florida Supreme Court opinion in State ex rel Holloway v. Sheats, 83 So. 508, 509 (Fla. 1919). There the Court said that the term office "implies a delegation of a portion of the sovereign power to, and the possession of it by, the person filling the office, while an 'employment' does not comprehend a delegation of any part of the sovereign authority." The authority to make arrests is deemed to be a delegation of the sovereign power sufficient to consider a person holding such authority to be a public officer. In a previous Commission opinion, CEO 88-30
We conclude that no prohibited conflict of interest would exist under this provision. Although it may be argued that FDLE would have regulatory authority over the Division of Finance by reason of its enforcement of criminal laws, in the past we have found such enforcement not to be the type of regulatory activity contemplated by this Code provision. See CEO 85-22 and CEO 81-67. We also do not find that FDLE and the Division of Finance would be "doing business" so as to create a conflict of interest. Past advisory opinions have found that intergovernmental relationships are not encompassed by this provision. See CEO 84-18 and CEO 81-5